As you know, I just updated the website and there are some consequences. The dates on older post are not correct. That wouldn’t seem like it matters, but the blog displays then in chronological order.
As for the post, I have never rejected a post that wasn’t spam. I am sure there are post I would reject. I won’t approve anything racist. I won’t approve anything that has no value. You get the picture.
Here is a comment I was emailed:
So your CR video #11 a couple months ago suddenly became relevant to me two weeks ago. I have a new active FDCPA defendant which removed to Federal as expected, and then promptly filed an Answer which denies practically every sentence I wrote. That was also not a big surprise, but they responded line by line, I half think just to be annoying. My complaint has almost a hundred numbered paragraphs, making reading their Answer a repetitive chore.
Anyway, I last fought a FDCPA paper battle for eight months and won handsomely through a Judgment offer. The opposition tried to wear me down with a new pleading or dismissal motion every other week. Brinksmanship on paper I can handle. The pretrial conference is new to me. I’ve never been past the clerk’s desk at my federal courthouse. If you have any time I’d appreciate some defogging of what’s ahead.
I can read the court rules and instructions well enough, but my nerves twitch over untested ground. There are 784 stupid ways to do something for every 3 smart ways, give or take. I don’t want to be the stupid guy, shamed and rebuked as yet another pro se ninny.
I comprehend that I don’t yet have to react to all of the often absurd denials in the Answer, but those things are begging for rebuttal. Per local court rules I’m expected to submit a statement next week “summarizing the facts of the case” and “identifying legal issues”. So is that the time, without trying to prove my whole case, to fire off some barbs and/or establish that I have serious problems with the opposing positions?
Oh yeah, and I got the defense classics, bona fide error and failure to state. Also, the violations I assert were all my fault due to my own “omissions”. Cue the huge question mark graphic over my head.
Then days later came the cute letter tapping a finger on the court rules and twice stressing that we’re meant to discuss potential settlement. Of course, no offer was made yet. I don’t know about you, but I never like haggling until I’m in a position of strength. I also never toss numbers, since what I want to make me happy is already on the complaint’s final page. So … what are the Smart Things one could do to regain a sense of high ground before the conference?
/\ Resident47 \/
Thanks for the comment Resident. A well written answer always just denies everything. It is almost shocking the first couple of times you see it. I hate to admit this and probably shouldn’t, but I don’t even read the answer in detail right away if I don’t need to. Just skim over it and put it in the case file in my office. At the federal court in Colorado, we don’t file a summary after the Answer. The next step is the scheduling conference or the defendants may file a Motion for Summary Judgement. Again, these activities seem to be cookie cutter activities to the defense attorneys.
I have never been to a pre-trial conference. I have been close on numerous occasions. I believe that is when the defending lawyers think all Pro Se litigants will fold. In my experience, it is a game of chicken. The closer you get the more nervous both parties get. If you do go to the conference, I would love to hear about it. The more we learn as a Pro Se group, the stronger and more formidable we all are.
Another idea is to check your court’s docket and go to a pre-trial conference of a different case. Learn from them.
Sorry I am not able to give you insight into the pre-trial conference. When I haven’t done something, I feel morally obligated to let you know.
Perhaps you should send the defense an offer of settlement that is the amount in your complaint. I don’t think you want the judge to slap you for not following the Rules if the Rules state you must attempt to settle.
Let us know what happens.
Thanks for fighting the essential fight, Boiler